<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="183" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://ir.zou.ac.zw/items/show/183?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-06-19T09:39:02+02:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="184">
      <src>https://ir.zou.ac.zw/files/original/ee0cc74cda23e317cc999e3d32b89f95.pdf</src>
      <authentication>eb8b14e04daae6e520a774925754566e</authentication>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="71">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="81">
                <text>Staff  Publications</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1146">
              <text>RESPONSE OF PIG WEED AMARANTHUS CRUENTUS TO ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1147">
              <text>REASON CHARACHIMWE&#13;
</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="1148">
              <text>LOVEJOY TEMBO</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="1149">
              <text>SOMMERSET MHUNGU</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1150">
              <text>Amaranthus is a relatively new and underutilized crop that has developed from being a weed to a vegetable in&#13;
many developing countries. However, its commercialization has been hampered by limited agronomic guidelines&#13;
that will facilitate large scale production of the vegetable. A field experiment was conducted at Horticultural&#13;
Research Centre in Marondera, Zimbabwe to investigate the response of Amarunthus cruentus to organic and&#13;
inorganic fertilizer. The trial was laid out in a randomized complete block design with eight treatments replicated&#13;
three times. The treatments used were 0 (control), 10, 15, 20t/ha cattle manure and four levels of inorganic&#13;
fertilizers 100, 200, 300, 400kg/ha NPK (7:14:7). Significant differences (P&lt;0.05) were observed with respect to&#13;
germination percentage, fresh yield, number of shoots, stem girth and plant height. All the inorganic fertilizer&#13;
treatments outperformed the organic fertilizer in all parameters assessed. Further research is recommended to&#13;
determine the appropriate rates of organic fertilizers for optimum performance.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1151">
              <text>International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="1152">
              <text>2018</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="541">
      <name>Amarunthus cruentus</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="542">
      <name>Organic fertilizer</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="543">
      <name>Synthetic fertilizer</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
