<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="125" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://ir.zou.ac.zw/items/show/125?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-05-03T15:56:19+02:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="124">
      <src>https://ir.zou.ac.zw/files/original/a9164d0a9438d86679701b4477ffc0f2.pdf</src>
      <authentication>58bcf2d9b46d3b590c452519beb59af7</authentication>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="59">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="69">
                <text>Staff  Publications</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="824">
              <text>CONVEYER BELT MARKING: OPINIONS OF ZIMSEC MARKERS&#13;
IN CHIKOMBA DISTRICT</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="825">
              <text>ROGERS NGARA </text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="826">
              <text>The purpose of the study was to establish markers perceptions of the newly introduced&#13;
system of marking. Participant responses were sought through using open ended&#13;
questionnaires. The study established that the CBM was considered advantageous in that&#13;
marking because it could be made more reliable, efficient and that it encouraged good&#13;
team spirit among makers. Nonetheless, some problems presented by CBM were opined&#13;
by participants. For instance fast markers were held back by the slow ones, mastering of&#13;
the whole marking scheme was not considered important yet in actual fact it was crucial&#13;
that each maker mastered it and the whole exercise was hurried. It was also expressed&#13;
that examiners were now getting lower remuneration compared to TMS. General&#13;
suggestions were made by participants on how CBM could be improved. The researchers&#13;
recommended that ample time be given to examiners for marking and that payment be&#13;
according to the actual number of responses an examiner would have marked.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="827">
              <text>HOPE Journal of Research (House of Pakistani Educationists)</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="828">
              <text>2013</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="367">
      <name>Conveyor belt marking</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="368">
      <name>Markers</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="369">
      <name>Traditional marking system</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
